Showing posts with label news politics and opinion blogs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news politics and opinion blogs. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Dave Lucas (news, views and interviews)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Dave Lucas, by Dave Lucas

WEB ADDRESS: dave-lucas.blogspot.com

BLOG DESCRIPTION: News, views and interviews from Dave Lucas (born October 29) , an American broadcast journalist, news anchor and talk show host. Dave is best known for the 1999 series of worldwide internet radio broadcasts surrounding the Jon Benet Ramsey murder case.

MY REVIEW: The author of this blog is currently Capital District Bureau Chief at WAMC Northeast Public Radio, a non-commercial listern supported public radio network (http://www.wamc.org/).

With all his experience, you know Lucas knows what he's talking about and all his posts are informed by his decades in the business. He talks about the news, with an emphasis on social media.

He's got some pretty interesting and informative things to say. Check it out!

Sample post:
Blogs, Blog Contests and BS
It seems I've "stirred the pot" a bit around the blogosphere with my stance on blog contests (and on guest-posting): someone even called me a "...blog monster, stuck on the ridiculous blogger platform."

Bloggers: Strive for COMMUNITY!

I recall signing up for something I think was called Tribe that was supposed to bring bloggers together… guess it petered out!

I loved MyBlogLog for its community spirit – of course, yahoo pulled the plug on it…

Bloggers have to be careful to build a real COMMUNITY – and not a CLIQUE – I know of a few blogs where you see 30-50 comments on very post but on closer inspection, those comments are divided among 3 other bloggers and the host blogger… and way at the bottom the site counter says ‘you are the third visitor today” – and it’s an hour until midnight!

I did everything I could think of (but never succeeded) to try to build a blog like the one LaShawn Barber published in the mid-2000′s when she was mostly a “political blogger.” I envied her “comments” area, which was more like an interactive forum: 30 to 200 comments on each post – every one from a UNIQUE visitor!

Lastly, SOCIAL MEDIA is NOT the best way to build a blog community, although it is a useful tool. There are a lot of bloggers who shun social media – a lot of “A-list” bloggers whose digital friendship is far more valuable than a "follow" on twitter or a "friendship" on facebook!

The Blog "Contests" that measure a successful guest-post by "mentions on social media" are just plain WRONG! the system is way too easy to game!

RECENT POSTS:
--La Oreja de Van Gogh
--Guest Blogging (what you should know)
--How to Identify B.S. Blog Articles
--Blog Contests Missing The Mark
--How To Make A Sticky Post
--Android Virus ANDROIDOS_NICKISPY.C Google++
--Twitter This and Tweet That
--Verizon: Strike Over (For Now)
--NetActive 21 August 2011
--Climate Feeds Conflict?

_______________
Reviews published every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
___________________________
Check out my kindle BOOKS!:
Whose Body, by Dorothy Sayers (the Annotated Edition)The Coldest Equations (science fiction)
Volcano Seven: Treasure and Treasure Hunters
The Lady and the Tiger...Moth

Monday, April 18, 2011

Rush Limbaugh Rebuttal (political)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Rush Limbaugh Rebuttal, by Political Partnership

WEB ADDRESS: http://rushlimbaughrebuttal.blogspot.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: When it comes to talk radio, hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity - present their side of the story, and very rarely present the rest of the story, let alone the other side of that story.

Since Rush Limbaugh is the most popular political talk show host, and since he's famous for presenting only one side - his side - I will share quotes from his radio program each day, and expand on them to reveal the real truth behind what he attempts to convey in his radio program.

MY REVIEW: Rush Limbaugh is one of the polarizing figures in America. This blog tells "the rest of the story" as Paul Harvey used to say. Limbaugh gives his version of events of the day, this blog chooses one of those events and gives that rest of the story.

If you're interested in Rush Limbaugh or the Conservative movement, you will find this blog of interest.

RECENT POSTS:
--Booklist: Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America
--Obama Reveals His Anger at Republicans During Obama's Budget Speech
--Rush Complains Abut Hoax News Reports Today
--Wisconsin May be Broke, But not Because of Unions
_______________
Reviews published every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Volcano Seven: Treasure and Treasure Hunters
Rush Limbaugh Report

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Bill O'Reilly's Column (political news and opinion


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Bill O'Reilly's Column, by Bill O'Reilly

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.billoreilly.com

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Bill O'Reilly's weekly column. Get access to it days before it is published in the newspapers

MY REVIEW: Conservative news talkers tend to get lumped together, but they are not all universally liked. Some Hannity fans don't like O'Reilly, Savage doesn't seem to like anybody, etc.

I enjoy reading O'Reilly's columns, even if I don't always agree with him. Of course the columns are well written and he sets out his arguments clearly.

You receive one column a week, but when you subscribe you've got 25 pages of article to read (with 4 titles on each page.)

There is something wrong with the formatting, you see the html code (<"br"> for line break, <"em"> for italic, and so on, but it's easy to ignore.

Recommended.

Sample post
Scaring White People

With polls showing about 70% of Americans believe building an Islamic cultural center containing a mosque just two blocks away from Ground Zero is inappropriate, the far left is once again on the run. Failing with the bogus "freedom of religion" argument, the crew that is offended by the manger scene at Christmas is now saying the mosque controversy is another attempt to "scare white people." Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson has put forth that loopy argument on his second home, MSNBC.

You may remember that the radical left designated the Shirley Sherrod story, the ACORN scandal, the New Black Panther/voting booth/Justice Department situation, and the resignation of White House "green jobs" czar Van Jones as previous attempts to scare white Americans. I don't know about you, but I'm white, and those stories did not frighten me. I hope I'm not out of the "white loop."

But here's a key question. Why are Howard Dean and Senator Harry Reid trying to scare white people? Those committed liberals both believe the mosque should be built somewhere else. Why are these guys trying to frighten Caucasians, and what can we do to stop them? It is simply unfair to have the Senate majority leader and the former Governor of Vermont running around trying to instill fear into white guys and gals. This must stop.

What is somewhat scary is that the far-left media continues to peddle this stuff, even in the face of economic disaster. CNN and MSNBC are in deep ratings trouble. Newsweek magazine recently sold for one dollar, and Time is having a tough go of it as well. Air America is bankrupt. The New York Times and the Washington Post are not nearly as successful or influential as they used to be. Not all of those concerns are far-left, but they do have an ideological kinship with the loons; it's just a matter of degree.

Meantime, the anti-liberal Fox News Channel and the Wall Street Journal, whose editorial page is conservative, are both doing very well.

It is because of situations like the Ground Zero mosque that the far left has lost credibility as well as viability. Americans are not stupid, no matter what color they may be. They understand that New York City has more than one hundred mosques and one more located near the site where thousands of innocent people where murdered by fanatical Muslims is certainly not necessary., especially because the building would offend thousands of people who lost loved ones on 9/11. Why would anyone want to offend them? Paging President Obama.

In the end, I believe the Muslim center will not be built. Some kind of compromise will most likely be reached. If not, I can't imagine any New York City construction firm lifting a hammer to build this project. So I predict it will not happen.

I know that may be scary to far-left people, and I apologize if my prognostication upsets you in any way. I never want to frighten anybody. I'll leave that to Congress.

RECENT POSTS:

_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Volcano Seven: Treasure and Treasure Hunters
Rush Limbaugh Report

Sunday, September 12, 2010

The Jawa Report (news and political opinion, War on Terror


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES, with reservations

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: The Jawa Report

WEB ADDRESS: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/

BLOG DESCRIPTION News/ commentary/ humor about the Global War Against Islamist Terror, Jihad, and Political Islam (Islamism).

REVIEW: This is an interesting blog, chronicling the lack of tolerance people in majority-Islamic countries have for the Christian minorities in their midst, as well as news about 9/11, the war on terror, etc.

Problems are that lots of posts consist only of a headline and an embedded Youtube video, which of course Kindle users can't see. And occasionally a news headline is given, but you must click on a link to go to a webpage to read the actual article.

So, check it out via the two-week free subscription, and compare it to the actual website, to decide if you'd like to maintain a subscription or find the blog of interest.

Sample post
Cross Worshipper Burned in One Sided Sectarian Clash
Jihad Watch:
When this story was first reported, the media described it the way it always describes Coptic persecution at the hands of Muslims -- as a "sectarian-clash." As this more revealing report makes clear, however, it was anything but a "sectarian-clash" (which suggests Christians and Muslims, in more or less equal numbers, fighting and rioting). Instead, a Muslim set a Christian on fire, and then other Muslims attacked his father, stabbing him to death -- this in a village where Christians make up maybe 3-4% of the total population. Keep this in mind the next time you hear about "sectarian clashes" occurring where Muslims predominate and non-Muslims live as minorities.

But but but...... using Copts as kindling is just a cultural thing. The Koran clearly states that building a fire using the People of the Book is like totally wrong or something.
[This post was made a week ago, quoting an event that happened last year.]
RECENT POSTS
--Blog Sabbath Caption Contest: Terry Jones Twoofer Edition
--Sandcrawler PSA: Template Tinkering
--September 11, 2010 Thank you to firefighters
--Nine Years
--Iran Launches 2,000 Blogger "Cyber War"


______________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Volcano Seven: Treasure and Treasure Hunters
Rush Limbaugh Report

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Little Green Footballs (political commentary)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: LIttle Green Footballs, by Charles Johnson

WEB ADDRESS: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: "Pretty much center-left before 9/11," Charles Johnson's blog discusses topics related to the War On Terror.

MY REVIEW: This blog is well-written, and covers the issues of the day. He's a Liberal, and so of course I disagree with practically everything he says! However, it's important to read these things, even if you disagree with them, to see where they are coming from.

Johnson is in support of the Mosque at Ground Zero, for example (along with many other people) and doesn't understand why people object to it. (As Rush Limbaugh states, they don't object to the mosque, just that it not be built there.)

In any event, interesting reading. Check it out.

Sample post:
Conservatives Waking Up to Global Warming?

There are signs that some right wing climate change deniers are finally waking up.
Science editor of the Daily Mail, Michael Hanlon, announced last week that he is changing his stance on global warming due to recent events in Greenland and his trip to this country (which he now refers to as “Global Warming Ground Zero”). Hanlon wrote: “I have long been something of a climate-change sceptic, but my views in recent years have shifted. For me, the most convincing evidence that something worrying is going on lies right here in the Arctic” (emphasis added). Joss Garman of Left Foot Forward said Hanlon “could previously be seen as the UK’s most influential ‘sceptic’” and has a good story on this and other recent changes in conservative media as concerns global warming.

And, on the other side of the Atlantic, a little over a week ago, CNN meteorologist Chad Myers made a breakthrough statement on one key issue of global warming, finally admitting that global warming IS caused (at least partly) by humans. Covering this story in more depth, Brad Johnson of The Wonk Room wrote: “One of America’s most influential global warming skeptics, CNN meteorologist Chad Myers, has finally admitted that global warming is “caused by man.’”

Now, most recently, oil-funded Pat Michaels, “a scientist who now works for the Cato Institute, the libertarian think tank that strongly opposes caps to carbon dioxide,” and who has promoted global warming denial for decades, has acknowledged that addressing global warming is an issue of “political acceptability.”

RECENT POSTS:
--Jon Stewart: The Hurt Talker
--Conservatives Waking Up to Global Warming?
--Overnight Open Thread
--Bloomberg on Anti-Mosque Movement: 'Unfair and Un-American'Politics

_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Volcano Seven: Treasure and Treasure Hunters
Rush Limbaugh Report

Thursday, August 19, 2010

The Campaign Spot on National Review Online (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: The Campaign Spot on National Review Online , by Jim Geraghty

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot

BLOG DESCRIPTION: The Campaign Spot is National Review Online’s blog for all things political and campaign-related. The blog is written by Jim Geraghty, author of Voting to Kill: How 9/11 Launched the Era of Republican Leadership.

MY REVIEW: First, let me share Geraghty's bio from Wikipedia:
Jim Geraghty is a conservative activist and regular contributor to National Review Online and National Review. In addition to writing columns for National Review, Geraghty also blogs for National Review Online and is a former reporter for States News Service.

During the 2004 US Presidential election, Geraghty was often critical of Democratic Party presidential candidate John Kerry. At the time his weblog used the name "The Kerry Spot". It was later renamed "TKS". Geraghty reported on the Killian documents and Rathergate stories on a daily basis on behalf of National Review and was critical of CBS and Dan Rather. Geraghty was one of the self described Pajamahadeen.

Starting in March 2005, Geraghty posted to TKS from Turkey, where he lived as an expatriate. In January 2007, he moved from TKS to a new blog, originally named "The Hillary Spot"[1] but since renamed to "The Campaign Spot".

Geraghty's book, Voting to Kill: How 9/11 Launched the Era of Republican Leadership (Touchstone, September 2006, ISBN 0743290429) argues that national security and safety in the face of terrorist threats is the key issue in U.S. politics.

Geragthy frequently mentions his maxim "All statements from Barack Obama come with an expiration date. All of them." This recurring theme in his writing is sometimes known as "Geraghty's Rule."

With this current incarnation of his blog, Geraghty bebops all over the map, giving one or at most two paragraph news items about what's going on with the various campaigners for poltical office for the Nov 2 election.

Pretty interesting, but not as ind-depth as one might wish. Nevertheless, check it out.

Sample post:
Pondering Nevada’s Ballot Order . . .
August 19, 2010 4:33 PM By Jim Geraghty

According to a sample ballot for Clark County, Nevada, candidates for office will be listed alphabetically.

Good news for Sharron Angle, bad news for next-to-last Harry Reid.

The somewhat better news for Reid is that federal offices are listed ahead of state offices. Harry Reid’s son, Rory Reid, is running for governor and trails badly. I suspect that if voters vote against the first Reid, they’ll be inclined to vote against the second one, and vice versa.

You think ballot order doesn’t matter? Ask Alvin Greene.

Another sample post:
An Obama Endorsement Hurts Candidates . . . in Illinois.
August 19, 2010 10:50 AM By Jim Geraghty

I doubt you’ll read anything more surprising today:

Illinois voters say they would be negatively influenced if a candidate was endorsed by Barack Obama. And if his support isn’t an asset in his home state it’s hard to imagine where it is.

40% of voters in the state say they’d be less likely to support an Obama endorsed candidate to only 26% who say it would be an asset. The reality at this point is that Obama turns Republican voters off to a much greater extent than he excites Democrats. That’s reflected in the fact that 83% of Republicans say an Obama endorsement would be a negative with them while only 49% of Democrats say it would be a positive. Independents also respond negatively by a 38/19 margin.

The numbers on an Obama endorsement are perhaps more relevant with undecided voters. Among those who have not yet made up their minds in the Senate race 21% say an Obama endorsement would resonate positively with them while 33% say it would be a turnoff.

We’re hearing a lot of talk about Obama being a one-term president, his presidency is over, etcetera, etcetera. Most of this is premature. But if Obama has become a political liability in Illinois . . . well, he’s really in the depths, and it’s quite possible he’ll never recover.

RECENT POSTS:
--Pondering Nevada’s Ballot Order . . .
--In Arkansas, Tim Griffin Clings to a 17-Point Lead
--Think of This Bad Poll for the GOP as a Palate-Cleanser
--An Obama Endorsement Hurts Candidates . . . in Illinois.
--Another Four Women Get Nods From Sarah Palin


_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Volcano Seven: Treasure and Treasure Hunters
Rush Limbaugh Report

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Conservatives With Attitude (political opinion and news)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Conservatives With Attitude, by Conservatives With Attitude

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.gopusanj.com/wordpress/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Conservative commentary.

MY REVIEW: There are 6 regular bloggers here, although Michael Illions does seem to do the majority of the postings. Others are Sharon Soon, Mike Proto, Dr. Murray Sabrin, Richard Zuendt and Richard Ross. There is also the occasional guest blogger.

Rush Limbaugh talks often of Governor Christie of New Jersey, and how well he is doing in espousing conservative principles, so it was interesting to see someone at this blog only give him a C+.

The blog is indeed, strictly about New Jersey politics. Nevertheless, it's an interesting read even if you're not from New Jersey. Depressing, too. When you read about how politics really works in this country, you wonder how we ever got anything done.

Sample post:
(Just because it has some interesting numbers)
Even with the ’summer time blues’ affecting everyone’s numbers, Conservatives with Attitude! continues to be ranked as the Number One Political Website/Blog in the State of New Jersey, according to the respected blog and website monitoring organization, Alexa.com.

This month we added a couple of new organizations into the mix, like Garden State Equality, New Jersey Family Policy Council and the NJEA.

Please note that these Alexa.com traffic rankings are not just reflective of political blogs and/or websites*, but rather anything and everything on the Web that receives traffic and hits, and are the traffic rankings for the United States.

As of Sunday, August 1st, here are the United States traffic rankings for some of the more well known New Jersey political blogs, campaign websites, activist websites, and issue based organizational websites.

Conservatives with Attitude!………………………………..76,657
More Monmouth Musings………………………… …………119,506
Save Jersey……………………………….……… …………..119,528
NJEA……………………………………… ……………………151,403
Blue Jersey…………… ……………………………………….206,348
Anna Little for Congress………… ……………………………602,792
New Jersey State Democrat Party………………… ………No US Ranking
New Jersey State Republican Party… ……………….……No US Ranking
Scott Sipprelle for Congress………………… ……………..No US Ranking
Jon Runyan for Congress…………………… ………………No US Ranking
New Jersey Right to Life…………………………… ……….No US Ranking
New Jersey Tea Party Coalition…………… ……………….No US Ranking
New Jersey Family Policy Council……… …………………No US Ranking
Garden State Equality………………………………… …….No US Ranking

Are these numbers shocking or what? Do you know what a well coded graphical campaign website costs these days?

They would get more exposure by taking an ad on Conservatives with Attitude! instead of paying a consultant THOUSANDS of dollars for a website that obviously NO ONE is reading.

Jon, Scott, call me for my special campaign ad rates!

How about a look at some bonus numbers; World Rankings by Alexa.com, just to show you the disparity and the strength of Conservatives with Attitude!, against those issues based organizations, campaigns or activist websites that do not have a US ranking.

Conservatives with Attitude!……………………… ………..259,789
Scott Sipprelle for Congress…………………… …………..2,850,265
New Jersey State Republican Party………………….……2,852,482
Jon Runyan for Congress……………………………… ……3,174,982
New Jersey State Democrat Party……… …………………3,555,933
New Jersey Right to Life………………………… ………….3,803,823
New Jersey Family Policy Council…… ……………………4,500,065
New Jersey Tea Party Coalition………… ………………….4,548,897
Garden State Equality…………………………… ………….5,004,538

The purpose of this post, you ask? Well, obviously it is put ourselves over. There is NO promotion like self-promotion. These rankings truly speak for themselves.

The other reason, is more of a smackdown to those who predicted this blogs demise because I moved to the Conservative Party of New Jersey. Guess what, we’re Still Hereeeee, and causing more trouble then ever before!

Mel Brooks said it best in History of the World, Part I; “It’s good to be the King!”

*The above rankings do not include on-line newspaper websites or political news websites like the Star-Ledger, Asbury Park Press and PolitickerNJ.com

Truth be told, an Alexa ranking of 259,789 is nothing to write home about either...

RECENT POSTS:
--Interview with Pamela Yellen, author of Bank On Yourself
--No wonder we are in trouble in New Jersey
--The Face of Fascism
--Chris Christie’s first six months: C+
--August 01, 2010
_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Monday, August 2, 2010

Cato&Liberty (politics and opinion)


Reviews by: Ms. Cairo

Recommendation: YES

Web URL: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/

Amazon Subscription page: Cato@Liberty .

Blog description: This is the official blog of the Cato Institute. Founded in 1977 by Edward H. Crane, the Cato Institute is a non-profit public policy research foundation headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Institute is named for Cato's Letters, a series of libertarian pamphlets that helped lay the philosophical foundation for the American Revolution.

I like this blog a lot – most of the authors make a lot of sense. Several authors make posts here, so its updated several times a day. Each entry is well thought out and well-written, and sticks on point.

Well worth checking out.

Sample post:
Matlock’s Medicare Pitch Ruled Out of Order
Posted by Michael F. Cannon

FactCheck.org says that in an ad purchased with your tax dollars, actor Andy Griffith (a.k.a., the sheriff of Mayberry and Matlock) used a “weasel word” to mislead Medicare enrollees about how ObamaCare will affect them:

Griffith tells his fellow senior citizens, “like always, we’ll have our guaranteed [Medicare] benefits.” But the truth is that the new law is guaranteed to result in benefit cuts for one class of Medicare beneficiaries — those in private Medicare Advantage plans…

[T]he term “guaranteed” is a weasel word — a qualifier that sucks the meaning out of a phrase in the way that weasels supposedly suck the contents out of an egg. It may sound to the casual listener as though this ad is saying that the benefits of all Medicare recipients are guaranteed to stay the same — and that may well be the way the ad’s sponsors wish listeners to hear it. But what the administration is really saying is that only those benefits that are guaranteed in law will remain the same.

FactCheck.org neglects to mention that ObamaCare will weaken the guarantee behind those “guaranteed” benefits, too. Medicare’s chief actuary Richard Foster notes that ObamaCare ratchets down Medicare’s price controls, which will “possibly jeopardiz[e] access to care for beneficiaries.” That’s not to say that the old price-control scheme is any better than the new one. It just means that the Obama administration is being even less honest and more weaselly than FactCheck.org says.

And they’re dragging Matlock down with them.



Recent posts:

-The Federal Government is bribing states to create more welfare dependency (actively recruiting people to go on food stamps)
-President Palin (why it won't happen)
-The Census and the Constitution
-ObamaCare=Litigation Bonanza
-The Government can monitor your location all day every day without implicating your fourth amendment rights

Saturday, July 31, 2010

George Will (news and political opinion)

REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: George Will, by George Will

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/03/24/LI2005032402294.html

BLOG DESCRIPTION: George F. Will is one of the most widely recognized, and widely read, writers in the world. With more than 450 newspapers and his biweekly Newsweek column, Will may be the most influential writer in America.

Will began his syndicated column with The Writers Group on January 1, 1974, just four months after The Writers Group was founded by Ben Bradlee and Katharine Graham. Two years later, Will started his back-page Newsweek column. In 1977, he won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary, for his newspaper columns, and garnered awards for his Newsweek columns, including a finalist citation in the Essays and Criticism category of the 1979 National Magazine Awards competition. He was also the recipient of a 1978 National Headliners Award for his "consistently outstanding special features columns" appearing in Newsweek. A column on New York City's finances earned him a 1980 Silurian Award for Editorial Writing. In January 1985, The Washington Journalism Review named Will "Best Writer, Any Subject." He was named among the 25 most influential Washington journalists by the National Journal in 1997.

Today Will serves as a contributing analyst with ABC News and has been a regular member of ABC's "This Week" on Sunday mornings since 1981.

Eight collections of his Newsweek and newspaper columns have been published: "The Pursuit of Happiness and Other Sobering Thoughts" (Harper & Row, 1978); "The Pursuit of Virtue and Other Tory Notions" (Simon & Schuster, 1982); "The Morning After: American Successes and Excesses 1981-1986" (Macmillan, 1986); "Suddenly: The American Idea Abroad and at Home 1986-1990" (The Free Press, 1990); "The Leveling Wind: Politics, the Culture & Other News 1990-1994" (Viking, 1994); "The Woven Figure: Conservatism and America's Fabric, 1994-1997" (Scribner, 1997); "With a Happy Eye But ... America and the World 1997--2002," (The Free Press, 2002); and "One Man's America: The Pleasures and Provocations of Our Singular Nation," (Crown Forum, 2008).

Other books include: "Statecraft as Soulcraft" (Simon & Schuster, 1983), a work of political philosophy that originally appeared as the Godkin Lecture at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard in 1981; "The New Season: A Spectator's Guide to the 1988 Election" (Simon & Schuster, 1987) which prefaced the 1988 presidential campaign; and "Men at Work: The Craft of Baseball" (Macmillan, 1989) which topped national best-seller lists in the number-one position for over two months. His book titled "Restoration: Congress, Term Limits and the Recovery of Deliberative Democracy" (Macmillan, 1992) argued for the need to limit politicians' time in office.

MY REVIEW: George Will is on vacation until August 10, but that should be no reason to not subscribe to his blog, because you'll get 20 of his articles, which will keep you busy until he gets back, and its only 10 days away anyway, and your blog subscription is free for the first 14 days, so you'll have plenty of time to evaluate whether or not you want to continue to read him.

I say, he's a must read.

Sample post:
The high price of American hubris
By George F. Will
Thursday, July 15, 2010

The story mocks a cliche: As they were leaving the Garden of Eden, Adam said to Eve, "Darling, we live in an age of transition." The first sentence of Barack Obama's letter introducing his new strategic review says Americans have often coped with "moments of transition" such as today's "time of sweeping change." Such boilerplate makes one weep -- and yearn for serious, meaning unsentimental, assessments of America's foreign policy tradition.

One is at hand. Taken to heart, Peter Beinart's "The Icarus Syndrome: A History of American Hubris" might spare the nation some tears.

In the Greek myth, Icarus is given wings in the form of feathers affixed by wax to a wooden frame. He also is given a warning: Do not fly too high lest the sun melt the wax. In the ecstasy of soaring, he forgot, and fell to his death.

Beinart discerns three varieties of highflying foreign policy hubris in the past 100 years, beginning with Woodrow Wilson, who injected the progressives' faith in domestic policy expertise into foreign policy. He exemplified the hubris of reason, which supposedly could bring permanent, because "scientific," peace to Europe. The political science professor told his wife they should draft a constitution for their marriage, then "make bylaws at our leisure." As president, he created the Inquiry, a bevy of intellectuals using reason to revise the borders that history had given to Old World nations.

Colonel Edward House, Wilson's aide, said he and the president received the Inquiry's report on Jan. 2, 1918: "We actually got down to work at half past ten and finished remaking the map of the world, as we would have it, at half past twelve."

Wilson said, in effect, "Stop the world, America wants to get off." He actually said America would "in no circumstances consent to live in a world governed by intrigue and force." And so the next war came, on Sept. 1, 1939, when dignitaries were in Geneva, birthplace and cemetery of the League of Nations, unveiling a statue of Wilson.

The First World War -- a.k.a. the war to end all wars -- was followed by the Second World War, and then the Cold War and the hubris of toughness. America, which Beinart says needed "a wider menu of analogies," now saw every foreign policy challenge through the retrospective prism of Munich:

"In 1939, few American politicians believed that a Nazi takeover of Warsaw constituted a grave danger to the United States. By 1965, many believed we couldn't live with a North Vietnamese takeover of Saigon. In the 1980s, Americans lived peacefully, albeit anxiously, with thousands of Soviet nuclear warheads pointed our way. By 2003, many Washington commentators claimed that even Iraqi biological or chemical weapons put us in mortal peril."

The postwar belief that U.S. "credibility" was crucial, perishable and at stake in far-flung crises "meant," Beinart says, "that unimportant places were important after all," and turned the doctrine of containment into an uncontained, hence hubristic, impulse. As the restraining memory of Korea faded -- a memory that helped President Dwight Eisenhower conduct a prudent foreign policy -- the (in John Kennedy's inaugural formulation) "trumpet" calling on America to "pay any price, bear any burden" summoned the country to worry perhaps excessively about involvement in Guatemala and the Dominican Republic.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, America's supremacy -- ideological, military and economic: the stock market doubled in value between 1992 and 1996 -- fed, Beinart says, a hubris of dominance. Using only air power, America compelled Serbia to remove its soldiers from part of Serbia -- the province of Kosovo. In Bosnia, America acted in response to ethnic cleansing. In Kosovo, Beinart argues, America acted to preempt ethnic cleansing: "Kosovo nudged open an intellectual door, a door George W. Bush would fling wide open four years later, when he cited 'preemption' to justify his invasion of Iraq."

Events eventually pop what Beinart calls "hubris bubbles." This may soon happen in Afghanistan, where Obama is in a tenuous, uneasy alliance with those Beinart calls "dominance conservatives."

Generational envy has, Beinart believes, propelled some Americans' searches for Hitlers to not appease. Boredom born of Cold War success caused them to find some. Hubris is a vice arising from ambition, which is, in moderation, a virtue. Hubris is a byproduct of success, of which America has had much. By producing folly, of which America has had too much, hubris is its own corrective. There is, however, a high tuition paid for such instruction.

RECENT POSTS:
--Puerto Rico calls to Republicans
--Through the Commonwealth, the GOP can reach out to Hispanics.
--Paying the price for hubris (By George F. Will, July 15, 2010)
--Putting the clamps on free speech (By George F. Will, July 11, 2010)
--Another round of Prohibition (By George F. Will, July 8, 2010)
--Nevada's undaunted 'nobody' (By George F. Will, July 4, 2010)
--Questions for Kagan (By George F. Will, June 28, 2010)
--Questions for the nominee (By George F. Will, June 27, 2010)

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

National Review Online (political news and opinion)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: National Review Online - Articles, by National Review

WEB ADDRESS: http://article.nationalreview.com

BLOG DESCRIPTION: National Review Online articles are written by leading conservative authors including Rich Lowry, Jonah Goldberg, Mark Steyn, Jay Nordlinger, Victor Davis Hanson, Charles Krauthammer, Larry Kudlow, Mona Charen, Andrew McCarthy, Cliff May, Kathryn Jean Lopez, Thomas Sowell, Conrad Black, Jim Geraghty, Daniel Pipes, Dennis Prager, Deroy Murdock, John Derbyshire, Ramesh Ponnuru, the Editors, and more.

MY REVIEW: This blog is a series of columns from a variety of authors, on the political news of the day. This is a must-read blog.

There are several "National Review Online" blogs available for subscription. This one is articles, there's one called The Corner, another is Campaign Politics, another is Money Politics, another, Planet Gore. In one sense, it's annoying, we should get all that in one blog for our $1.99 a month..but it's the capitalistic system at work.

I think this blog is well worth subscribing to. Check it out.

Sample post:
It’s About Sharia
by Andrew C. McCarthy
Newt Gingrich resets our national-security debate

The 2010 midterms have not happened yet, but the 2012 campaign is under way. For that we can thank Newt Gingrich. Not because Gingrich is a candidate, though he almost certainly is. And not because he can win, because that is by no means certain. We should thank Gingrich because he has crystallized the essence of our national-security challenge. Henceforth, there should be no place to hide for any candidate, including any incumbent. The question will be: Where do you stand on sharia?

The former speaker of the House gets the war on terror. For one thing, he refuses to call it the “war on terror,” which should be the entry-level requirement for any politician who wants to influence how we wage it. Gingrich grasps that there is an enemy here and that it is a mortal threat to freedom. He knows that if we are to remain a free people, it is an enemy we must defeat. That enemy is Islamism, and its operatives — whether they come as terrorists or stealth saboteurs — are the purveyors of sharia, Islam’s authoritarian legal and political system.

This being the Era of the Reset Button, Gingrich is going about the long-overdue business of resetting our understanding of the civilizational jihad that has been waged against the United States for some 31 years. It is the jihad begun when Islamists overran the American embassy in Tehran, heralding a revolutionary regime that remains the No. 1 U.S. security challenge in the Middle East, as Gingrich argued Thursday in a provocative speech at the American Enterprise Institute.

The single purpose of this jihad is the imposition of sharia. On that score, Gingrich made two points of surpassing importance. First, some Islamists employ mass-murder attacks while others prefer a gradual march through our institutions — our legal, political, academic, and financial systems, as well as our broader culture; the goal of both, though, is the same. The stealth Islamists occasionally feign outrage at the terrorists, but their quarrel is over methodology and pace. Both camps covet the same outcome.

Second, that outcome is the death of freedom. In Islamist ideology, sharia is deemed to be the necessary precondition for Islamicizing a society — for Islam is not merely a religious doctrine, but a comprehensive socio-economic and political system. As the former speaker elaborated, sharia embodies principles and punishments that are abhorrent to Western values. Indeed, its foundational premise is anti-American, holding that we are not free people at liberty to govern ourselves irrespective of any theocratic code, that people are instead beholden to the Islamic state, which is divinely enjoined to impose Allah’s laws.

Sharia, moreover, is anti-equality. It subjugates women and brutally punishes transgressors, particularly homosexuals and apostates. While our law forbids cruel and unusual punishments, Gingrich observed that the brutality in sharia sanctions is not gratuitous, but intentional: It is meant to enforce Allah’s will by striking example.

On this last point, Gingrich offered a salient insight, one well worth internalizing in the Sun Tzu sense of knowing one’s enemy. Islamists, violent or not, have very good reasons for the wanting to destroy the West. Those reasons are not crazy or wanton — and they have nothing to do with Gitmo, Israel, cartoons, or any other excuse we conjure to explain the savagery away. Islamists devoutly believe, based on a well-founded interpretation of Islamic doctrine, that they have been commanded by Allah to kill, convert, or subdue all who do not adhere to sharia — because they regard Allah as their only master (“There is no God but Allah”). It is thus entirely rational (albeit frightening to us) that they accept the scriptural instruction that the very existence of those who resist sharia is offensive to Allah, and that a powerful example must be made of those resisters in order to induce the submission of all — “submission” being the meaning of Islam.

It makes no sense to dismiss our enemies as lunatics just because “secular socialist” elites, as Gingrich called them, cannot imagine a fervor that stems from religious devotion. We ought to respect our enemies, he said. Not “respect” in Obama-speak, which translates as “appease,” but in the sense of taking them seriously, understanding that they are absolutely determined to win, and realizing that they are implacable. There is no “moderate” sharia devotee, for sharia is not moderate. Gingrich noted that in response to global outcry against the prospect of death by stoning for an Iranian woman, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, convicted of adultery, the mullahs’ great concession appears to be that she will be hanged instead. Islamism is not a movement to be engaged, it is an enemy to be defeated.

Victory, Gingrich said, will be very long in coming — longer, perhaps, than the nearly half-century it took to win the Cold War. Invoking JFK, he urged that the survival and success of liberty will still require an unwavering commitment to pay any price and bear any burden, for as long as it takes. Will that entail an ambitious project to democratize Islamic countries — notwithstanding that sharia dictates waging jihad against Westerners who try? Gingrich’s embrace of President Bush’s second inaugural address suggests that he may think so.

How we go about it and whether we use our military to spearhead a “forward march of freedom” are matters the former speaker did not flesh out. He also wondered aloud why, after nearly nine years in Afghanistan, we had not tasked military engineers and contractors to blanket that backward land with highways, the roads to advancement and prosperity. But we haven’t defeated the enemy yet. One can agree wholeheartedly with the former speaker that, having taken on a war against Afghan Islamists, it is imperative that America win. But in World War II, which Gingrich invoked repeatedly, and to great effect, we had our priorities straight: unambiguous victory first; then, and only then, the Marshall Plan’s ambitious reconstruction of Europe and Japan.

Debate over all of this is essential. The crucial point is that we must have the debate with eyes open. It is a debate about which Gingrich has put down impressive markers: The main front in the war is not Afghanistan or Iraq but the United States. The war is about the survival of Western civilization, and we should make no apologies for the fact that the West’s freedom culture is a Judeo-Christian culture — a fact that was unabashedly acknowledged, Gingrich reminded his audience, by FDR and Churchill. To ensure victory in the United States we must, once again, save Europe, where the enemy has advanced markedly. There is no separating our national security and our economic prosperity — they are interdependent. And while the Middle East poses challenges of immense complexity, Gingrich contended that addressing two of them — Iran, the chief backer of violent jihad, and Saudi Arabia, the chief backer of stealth jihad — would go a long way toward improving our prospects on the rest.

Most significant, there is sharia. By pressing the issue, Newt Gingrich accomplishes two things. First, he gives us a metric for determining whether those who would presume to lead us will fight or surrender. Second, at long last, someone is empowering truly moderate Muslims — assuming they exist in the numbers we’re constantly assured of. Our allies are the Muslims who embrace our freedom culture — those for whom sharia is a matter of private belief, not public mission. Our enemies are those who want sharia to supplant American law and Western culture. When we call out the latter, and marginalize them, we may finally energize the former.

It’s that simple. Not easy, but simple.

RECENT POSTS:
--It’s About Sharia
--Freaky Politics
--Brownback’s Mountain
--FDR and the Depression, A New Round

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Chickaboomer (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Chickaboomer, by Marty Davis

WEB ADDRESS: http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: TV news, talk radio, politics
(That's all the description she gives. But her wikipedia entry states: Marty Davis (January 8, 1949 - Detroit Michigan) is a former network radio and television news anchor with a master's degree in journalism from the American University, Washington, D.C. Marty Davis has appeared on NBC's Today Show,[5] MSNBC, CNBC, CNN[6] and other media outlets. She also served as a correspondent for Gary Collins' syndicated talk show Hour Magazine)

MY REVIEW: I don't care very much for Davis's website. There's a photo of her actually giving the finger to... her readers. (She's staring at the viewer...which is whoever's reading her blog/website, and giving us the fnger? Heck, if Limbaugh ever did that...!)

Anyway, presumably this is supposed to be a political blog, but she doesn't seem to cover anything in very much detail. A couple of paragraphs only on any subject, and very few on any topic of real importance. Mostly she seems to talk about the personalities in the news - Joe Haldeman, Piers Morgan, Keith Olberman, Anderson Cooper

Recent post:
NBC, CBS: Pussies Galore
THR's James Hibberd: NBC and CBS have rejected an advertisement that urges viewers to protest a mosque being constructed two blocks from Ground Zero. The broadcasters have refused to air the one-minute commercial, sponsored by the National Republican Trust PAC, which critics have called inflammatory. The ad mixes images of 9/11 and Muslim militants while slamming a controversial proposal to build a mosque and Muslim community center in lower Manhattan. "To celebrate that murder of 3,000 Americans, they want to build a monstrous 13-story mosque at Ground Zero," the narrator says over images of the destroyed World Trade Center. "This ground is sacred, where we weep, they rejoice ... that mosque is a monument to their victory." Yet in rejecting the ad, NBC Universal advertising standards manager Jennifer Riley didn't take issue with the content, but rather the vague construction of its narration. "An ad questioning the wisdom of building a mosque at Ground Zero would meet our issues of public controversy advertising criteria," she wrote. "However, this ad, which ambiguously defines 'they' as referenced in the spot, makes it unclear as to whether the reference is to terrorists or to the Islamic religious organization that is sponsoring the building of the mosque." Reps from ABC and Fox said they had no knowledge of the ad being submitted to their networks.


RECENT POSTS:
--Letterman Con Up For Emmy
--CNN's Dissociative Identity Disorder
--Revenge of the Nerd
--'Putsch' Schultz on 'Eunuch' Harry
--NBC, CBS: Pussies Galore

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

BCNN (Black Christian News Network)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: BCNN1

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.blackchristiannews.com/news/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: BCNN1 is dedicated to reporting breaking news from a black, Christian perspective.

The mission of BCNN1 is to: Proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ to people of African descent and whosoever will. Inspire people with Christian books and materials. Educate people with the news of the world. Inform people with stories that impact their lives.

Our Motto: "For Praying, Thinking and Doing Christians"

MY REVIEW: BCNN is a series of websites - with breaking news videos, a Christian magazine, news from Africa with a Christian perspective, news from the Caribbean with a Christian perspective, news from the Latino community with a Christian perspective, and a digital radio station with Bible teachings and Christian music.

The news in the blog is not exclusively for African Americans, although they do have an emphasis on it, but news of interest to all Christians is included. The articles aren't afraid to be critical of President Obama whom the authors feel is going to far to embrace Islam, and they don't appreciate his stand on abortion. (Which is funny...as Obama's stand on allowing abortion is the only thing I like about him!)

Anyway, this blog is of interest to all Christians, not just African American Christians. Highly recommended.

RECENT POSTS:
--Famed Gospel Artist, Walter Hawkins, Goes Home to be With the Lord at 61
--Black Congregation in Houston Has Church Burned, a Pastor Who Killed his wife, and infighting
--Ministers Encourage Church Members to Tithe, Even n Recessoin
--Rev Sheila Schuller Says Evangelist Robert H. Schuller is not Retiring
--Chaplain Who Prayed In Jesus' Name and Was Fired Demands Apology
--7 OUt of 10 Christian Households Eliminate Debt and Avoid Debt
--Atlanta Police Work Hard to Rid the City of the Sex Trade

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death]
Rush Limbaugh Report

Monday, July 12, 2010

Yglesias (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Yglesias, by Center for American Progress Action Fund

WEB ADDRESS: http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Matthew Yglesias is a Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. He holds a BA in Philosophy from Harvard University. His first book, Heads in the Sand, was published in May 2008 by Wiley. Matt has previously worked as an Associate Editor at The Atlantic, a Staff Writer at The American Prospect, and an Associate Editor at Talking Points Memo. His writing has appeared in The New York Times, the Guardian, Slate, The Washington Monthly, and other publications. Matthew has appeared on Fox News and MSNBC, and been a guest on many radio shows.

MY REVIEW: You certianly get your money's worth from this author - he posts several times a day. He's a Liberal, and has interesting talking points. Highly recommended (as long as you read a blog on the opposite side, for balance.) Another author who doesn't really descend to sarcasm, which is refreshing, but some of his views are so wrong. ; )

Sample post
In this post, note that Yglesias accuses the Governor of Arizona of "making up" stories about Phoenix becoming the #2 kidnap capital in the world, etc.... but does not prevent a link to an article which provides the proof that she made this up. While on the other hand there are articles in mainstream media that point this out.

Also note that it's always "immigration", "immigration", "immigration," with never any attempt to point out that it is bloody ILLEGAL immigration that is the problem!!!!!
Jan Brewer’s Made-Up Immigration Stories
One thing that’s frustrating to me about the immigration debate is the extent to which it’s driven by sincerely believed, but quite clearly false, factual ideas about immigration and immigrants. Dana Milbank’s latest column is a great exercise in exposing how far the paranoia runs:

The Arizona governor, seemingly determined to repel every last tourist dollar from her pariah state, has sounded a new alarm about border violence. “Our law enforcement agencies have found bodies in the desert either buried or just lying out there that have been beheaded,” she announced on local television. [...] But those in fear of losing parts north of the neckline can relax. There’s not a follicle of evidence to support Brewer’s claim. [...]

Brewer’s mindlessness about headlessness is just one of the immigration falsehoods being spread by Arizona politicians. Border violence on the rise? Phoenix becoming the world’s No. 2 kidnapping capital? Illegal immigrants responsible for most police killings? The majority of those crossing the border are drug mules? All wrong.

The upshot of this is to create a toxic cycle of misinformation. Conservative politicians and media celebrities spread these ideas. Their fans believe them. Then when Dana Milbank or I or anyone else tries to set the record straight, that just goes to show that we’re liberals. So anyone who wants to be seen as credible in conservative circles doesn’t want to take these ideas on. So people become even more entrenched in the view that illegal immigration is causing a plague of violence. Which makes it even harder for anyone to bring some facts to the table.

RECENT POSTS:
--Endgame
--Military Spurring Research Into Self-Driving Cars
--World War II Marred By Poor Plotting and Unrealistic One-Dimensional Characters
--University of California Moving Toward Increased Price-Gouging of Students
--Americans Fuzzy on What “Progressive” Means
--The Pain in Spain
--Subsidizing the Rich
--A New Hope for the Fed
--Debt Commission Eying Mostly-Cuts Package
--Buying Land in Jerusalem
_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

The Raw Story (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Raw Story, by Raw Story Media

WEB ADDRESS: http://rawstory.com

BLOG DESCRIPTION: A rational voice: Sharp-edged muckraking politics, analysis and investigative reporting.

MY REVIEW: Another website and blog on the left side of the aisle (Democrat and Liberal). Multiple posts per day - of all kinds of news, not just political - well written and interesting to read. Recommended.

Sample post:
My own opinion -- BP has "dared" to cut back on payments to claimants who didn't fill out their claim forms adequately. But, I thought Obama had removed BP from the equation? They had to give their money to Obama's task force, and it is the US government that is responsible for handing out money. In addition, let us not forget that in every disaster of this magnitude, seems like the scammers are out in force and usually billions of dollars are wasted on these scammers. Is BP - assuming it is BP and not the US government - to be faulted for trying to make sure only legitimate vicitms are compensated? Is BP to be faulted for expecting claimants to be able to fill out their forms correctly?

Here's the post:
BP ‘cuts payments to 40,000′ over incomplete claims forms

By Raw Story
Sunday, July 11th, 2010 -- 11:53 am


BP plans to reduce payments to some 40,000 oil-spill claimants, potentially making life more difficult for individuals and businesses affected by the Gulf oil spill, a Louisiana official has said.

The Associated Press reports that Louisiana's secretary for children and family services, Kristy Nichols, found "a significant cut in daily payments" during a recent review of claims against BP, which appears to be related to incomplete forms.

In a letter to Ken Feinberg, the federal administrator of the oil spill claims process, Nichols wrote that it was "rash" of BP to cut payments to 40,000 of the 99,000 claims filed so far.

Nichols wrote:

It is rash for BP to make this decision without consulting the State to determine if there are alternative methods for obtaining the documentation in State records. If not quickly rectified, the direct impact will be devastating to individuals surviving financially month-to-month. This action is irresponsible and in complete contrast to BP's repeated promise that they will "make things right." BP has negatively impacted these people's livelihoods as a result of the oil spill and has not kept pace with their needs.

Nichols suggested that BP use government records, such as those held by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, to fill in missing information. She argued that claimants often don't have access to the information required on the claim forms.

Nichols went on to say that BP is differentiating between claims made as a result of the oil spill and claims made as a result of the moratorium on deepwater drilling enacted by the Obama administration, and recently overturned by federal judge.

"When the State asked BP how many claims fall into this category, representatives stated that the current design of their database does not allow them to identify that information," Nichols wrote, adding that that amounts to "a significant flaw" in the system's design.

"The moratorium is the direct result of the oil disaster and people affected should be adequately, accurately and promptly compensated," she wrote.

Nichols also suggested that BP's willingness to pay claims may be correlated to the political pressure it's feeling to respond to the oil spill.

"Analysis has shown that BP issued the most claims checks in the middle of June, with a spike that came within a week of additional pressure placed on BP by the State. Payments to large loss claimants show the same type of spike immediately after the state pressured BP regarding those claims," she wrote.


RECENT POSTS:
--'Disappointed' US will keep after Polanski
--Tampa sinkhole forces evacuations
--New Mexico man kills coworkers, self
--Some Dem govs fret about 'US vs. AZ'
--Kyl: Don't offset tax break for rich
--Critics: NYPD abuse 'stop and frisks'
--Gibbs: Democrats may lose House
--Radar releases new Mel Gibson rant
--Israel calls flotilla violence 'justified'
--Belly-buttons 'key to success in sports'
--Most aid for Haiti never arrived
--Castro: World nuclear war is at hand
--Costa Rica 'invites' 46 US warships
--Spain wins WorldCup in nail-biter
--Heroes' welcome for Spanish soccer team
--Iran halts brutal stoning, 'for now'

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Tapped (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Tapped, by The American Prospect

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped

BLOG DESCRIPTION: TAPPED, the Prospect's award-winning group blog, is a link-intensive collection of musings, ramblings, opinions and other assorted writing on the political developments of the day.

MY REVIEW: This is another blog that gives you your money's worth. Multiple posts a day, from different authors - all of whom seem to be Democrats or Liberals. Very interesting to read their take on certain subjects (I've heard no outrage over what goes on in Brownsville, Brooklyn, in fact I'd never heard of Brownsville Brooklyn til I read an article about it on this blog, and I was surprised to see the author didn't even mention that this "could be" what is going to happen in Arizona...
The New York Times has a great story about police officers using the stop, question, and frisk tactic in Brownsville, Brooklyn -- one of the many areas designated an "impact zone" under commissioner Ray Kelly. Those zones are flooded with police officers, often new recruits, who reinforce small quality-of-life crimes like having an open alcohol container in public and questioning folks who appear to be loitering on the street in an effort to prevent bigger, more violent crimes. The department is pretty open about the point, too: If they arrest someone for something as mundane as jumping a turnstile in the subway, or for blocking pedestrians on the sidewalk (which is one of the shadier subsections of the disorderly conduct statute), then officers can search them incident to a lawful arrest and find out if they have a weapon. The same is true if officers begin questioning someone and can articulate a reasonable suspicion that they have a weapon. Making "furtive movements" was one of the most commonly cited reasons for a frisk.

Obviously this must be a procedure on the Brownsville police department's part to keep the citizens safe...why is their no outrage over this? Presumably because Brownsville has no illegal aliens? [And after further research I see that articles about this practice by the police are just now appearing in papers like the New York Times.]

Anyway, multiple authors, similar viewpoints, and its interesting to read these articles and think their views are sooooo wrong....and yet there must be so many thousands of people who think their views are sooooooo right! An interesting study in human nature.

Sample post:
Shifting the Balance From the Senate.

Ruth Marcus writes today that President Obama's decision to install Donald Berwick by recess appointment was "outrageous." By her lights, a recess appointment is "the last step in cases of egregious delay," and Obama should have gone through the normal confirmation process before taking this option.

Marcus, like others, doesn't seem to understand that the Senate has seen a tremendous change in norms, beginning with the 104th Congress and continuing into the present. Whereas previous Senates were mostly deferential to the president's nominees, these Senates -- and particularly the current one -- have taken to routinely opposing nominees, regardless of the position's importance or the candidate's actual acceptability. This is key; when there is a clear policy reason for a filibuster -- for instance, the nominee's ideology is objectionable to the critical vote in a filibuster -- the president can still meet his goals by offering a similar but less objectionable nominee. But when obstruction is routine, and there's no point at which the president can meet the preferences of an objecting senator without sacrificing his goals, then it doesn't make any sense for a president to bother with the confirmation process.

Instead of chastising President Obama for circumventing the confirmation process, critics of this recess appointment should direct their fire at the Senate. By refusing to confirm hundreds of unobjectionable nominees, Senate Republicans have drastically tilted the balance of power in their direction, forcing the president to rely on his other powers. The more Republicans refuse to confirm the president's nominees, the more he'll appoint them during recess. As I've said before, I think this is a good thing; not only does it allow the president to pursue his policy choices -- as is his prerogative -- but in the absence of Senate reform, it can push the minority into greater cooperation. By cutting them out of the process, President Obama will force Senate Republicans to choose between some input and none, pushing them to yield on all but the most controversial nominees.
-- Jamelle Bouie

RECENT POSTS:
--Lightning Round: Demystifying The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
--McCain Worship Never Dies.
--The Little Picture: Progressive What?
--The Trouble With Tech Reporting.
--Preparing for a Scandal-Happy 112th Congress.
--Forget the Truth, Give Me the Spin!
--Stop-and-Frisk State.


_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Paul Krugman: The Conscience of a Liberal (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Paul Krugman: The Conscience of a Liberal by The New York Times Co, by Paul Krugman

WEB ADDRESS: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Paul Krugman is an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times. Mr. Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes. His professional reputation rests largely on work in international trade and finance; he is one of the founders of the "new trade theory," a major rethinking of the theory of international trade

MY REVIEW: I heartily recommend this blog. He's a liberal, but he seems to present a balanced side to all this issues (although believing that the Republicans are in the wrong, of course.) He's also refreshingly free from all the sarcasm that seems to permeate most political blogs these days (and radio programs! I'm a Limbaugh fan but some of his schticks do grate.)

Anyway, as you may imagine, Krugman writes well. He sets out his points clearly and concisely. He's on the side of the liberals but he's not afraid to criticize Obama or the Dems, and of course he's not afraid to criticize Republicans either.

(In a sample post of his below, I chose the one where he is calling for a new stimulus plan, saying that the first one was too small! Let us not forget that half of the "stimulus" money hasn't been spent yet. According to Limbaugh, it's going to be used in 2011 to help Dems with their campaigning....

So you definitely get two sides of every issue if you read this blog, and either listen to Limbaugh or read a right wing blog.

Some of his posts are quite short. For example he went to see Get Me to the Greek and couldn't think of anything good to say about it (glad to hear that, as I knew there couldn't be anything good to say about it, but why even go to see it? The trailers themselves should have been enough to sink this piece of garbage into oblivion.)

Sample post
July 9, 2010, 8:50 am
What Went Wrong?
The Obama administration is in a difficult spot. It’s now obvious that the stimulus was much too small; yet there’s virtually no chance of getting additional measures out of Congress. The administration has chosen to deal with this by trying to have it both ways — condemning Republicans, rightly, for obstructionism, while at the same time claiming, falsely, that we’re still on the right track.

How did things end up this way? We’ll never know whether the administration could have passed a bigger plan; we do know that it didn’t try.

Now, I don’t have any inside information on what really happened; I do talk to WH economists, but they don’t offer — and I don’t ask for — any information on internal wrangling. But based on public reporting, like the Ryan Lizza article on Larry Summers — which reads rather differently now that we know how things are really working out, or more accurately not working out — it looks as if top advisers convinced themselves that even in the absence of stimulus the slump would be nasty, brutish, but not too long. That’s the assumption embedded in the now infamous Romer-Bernstein chart, above. So all policy needed to do was meliorate the worst, while we waited for the economy to recover spontaneously. From the Lizza article:

Summers did not include Romer’s $1.2-trillion projection. The memo argued that the stimulus should not be used to fill the entire output gap; rather, it was “an insurance package against catastrophic failure.”

I don’t know why Summers etc. believed this. Even before the severity of the financial crisis was fully apparent, the recent history of recessions suggested that the jobs picture would continue to worsen long after the recession was technically over. And by the winter of 2008-2009, it was obvious that this was the Big One — which, if the aftermath of previous major crises was any guide, would be followed by multiple years of high unemployment.

Those concerns were what had me fairly frantic in early 2009: I was terribly afraid that the failure of an inadequate stimulus to bring unemployment down would end up being seen as a refutation of the whole idea of stimulus — which is exactly what happened. And by the way, the reason I was for temporary bank nationalization was that it would make it possible to recapitalize banks quickly, and get them lending, which would help make up for the weak stimulus; what happened instead, of course, was gradual recapitalization through profits, with banks not doing much lending along the way.

And here we are. From a strictly economic point of view, we could still fix this: a second big stimulus, plus much more aggressive Fed policy. But politically, we’re stuck: even if the Democrats hold the House in November, they won’t have the votes to do anything major.

I’d like to say something uplifting here; but right now I’m feeling pretty bleak.

RECENT POSTS:
--What Have We Learned? Never forget that as far as the facts go, the Keynesians won this hands down.
--The Revenge of Felipe II - Take that, you heretical Dutchmen.
--Lacking All Conviction - What is the Obama team thinking?
--Trending Toward Deflation - Are we there yet? Almost, by some measures.
--Get Him To The Greek - I have nothing more to say that's fit to print.

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Rush Limbaugh Report (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: Yes

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: The Rush Limbaugh Report

WEB ADDRESS: http://rushlimbaughreport.blogspot.com

BLOG DESCRIPTION: I'm a Republican. I'm also an atheist, a feminist, pro-gay rights, pro-animal rights, pro abortion. But I support the Republican ideals of American exceptionalism, of standing on your own two feet. In this blog, I use the Rush Limbaugh program as a launch pad to discuss my own views on the day's events.

MY REVIEW: A brand new blog, only a couple of days old. The author shares news headlines from various media, then talks about politics...or at least, is going to do so starting this coming Monday.

She writes well, she has definite opinions. Check it out.

Sample post (without accompanying video)
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Limbaugh's Immigration Rules
The Rush Limbaugh program runs, in my neighborhood, from 12 noon to 3 pm Monday through Friday. I won't bother with the Sunday "Best of Rush" which is really only a repeat of a program held during the week.

Although I've listened to the Rush Limbaugh program for a few years now, I'm going to use this blog "going forward" and won't dwell too much on past events unless a reason arises to do so.

I will share Limbaugh's "Rules of Immigration," however, because they reveal the hypocrisy of Mexico and the terrible constraints that the American government and people are living under in an attempt to stop illegal immigration (as opposed to legal immigration!)

Limbaugh reads out a list of precepts....that make a lot of sense actually...and then reveals that they are actually the Immigration Laws of Mexico! Yes, folks, Mexico deports more illegal aliens than the USA des! And yet when Arizona enacts a law which will enable that state to enact Federal law (which the Feds refuse to do), President Calderon starts screaming racism. Apparently its okay for Mexicans to toss other Middle American and South American people out of their country, but when Americans do it, it's racism.

And the mainstream media doesn't point out this little bit of hypocrisy. Astonishing.

RECENT POSTS:
--Sunday, July 11, 2010 News Headlines
--How This Blog Works
--Saturday July 10, 2010 News headlines
--Limbaugh's Immigration Rules
--Friday, July 9, 2010. Limbaugh's stuff
--Friday, July 9, 2010 news headlines

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Right Wing News (politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Right Wing News, by John Hawkins

WEB ADDRESS: http://rightwingnews.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Your number one source for conservative news, views, and interviews. "Kneecapping Barack Obama at every opportunity."

MY REVIEW: I give this blog a yes because it has entries every day and there are no Kindle formatting issues - all text is transferred over.

Having said that, I'm not too thrilled with this blog. The sarcasm quotient is off the charts. There are several writers, and each one indulges in it. I've yet to see a post that presents the issues clearly and plainly without a few partisan shots, and it gets annoying after a while. Yes, Limbaugh does it too, so does Glenn Beck, but with this blog its just constant and never-ending.

If you can get past the constant sarcasm, the posts are of interest.

Once in a while a YouTube video is linked, which of course Kindle users can't see, but this is only one blog out of every 10 or so, not really a concern.

RECENT POSTS:
--SusanAnne Hiller Why Didn’t the Democrats Take a Vote on Deficit-Neutral Unemployment Bill?
--Donald Douglas Hot Sunday Blogging!
--William Teach Uh Oh: NY Times Shows Their Disdain For The 2nd Amendment
--Lori Ziganto Levi Johnston, The Liar: Are His 15 Minutes of Fame Finally Up?
--Donald Douglas More Lego Blogging!
--TrogloPundit See? The president is cutting the deficit!

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Friday, July 9, 2010

Prometheus Unbound (art and entertainment, politics)


REVIEWED BY: Ms. Cairo

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Prometheus Unbound, by Santi Tafarella

WEB ADDRESS: http://santitafarella.wordpress.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Santi Tafarella teaches writing and literature at a college in California, and his blog offers daily reflections on books, culture, and politics.

MY REVIEW: Prometheus, for anyone who may not know, was a demi-god who stole fire from heaven and gave it to mankind. Zeus was so angry that he tied Prometheus to a rock, and sent a vulture to eat his liver every day. Every night, the liver would grow back, so that for eternity Prometheus would be suffering that torment.

(I can't remember from what book I read it...but there's a line from a poem that has always stuck with me: "The rock, the vulture and the chain, all that the proud can feel of pain."

Then there's the poem from Lord Byron (about Napoleon, actually):

"Or, like the thief of fire from heaven,
Wilt thou withstand the shock?
And share with him- the unforgiven-
His vulture and his rock?" )

Well, now that I've demonstrated that I have some slight knowledge of the classics, on to the review. I enjoyed this blog, for all that I don't think I'd approve of the author's politics. He seems to support Obama! (On the other hand, he has no brief with Sara Palin, and I must agree with him there. She's too much of an opportunist for my taste. And if Obama has taught us anyting, it's that we don't want someone with no experience running the White House!)

Anyway, this blog is well written, and you get a lot of bang for your buck. Each entry is practically an essay, well thought out and well presented.

Sample post:
Will Albert Mohler Be Tapped by Sarah Palin as One of Her Science Advisors?With regard to the universe’s appearance of vast age, Albert Mohler, President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, offers this curious argument:

The universe looks old because the creator made it whole. When he made Adam, Adam was not a fetus; Adam was a man; he had the appearance of a man. By our understanding that would’ve required time for Adam to get old but not by the sovereign creative power of God. He put Adam in the garden. The garden was not merely seeds; it was a fertile, fecund, mature garden. The Genesis account clearly claims that God creates and makes things whole.
Yes, and the dinosaurs were put in the ground with the appearance of age as well. And the moon has meteor impact craters with rock fragments in them that date to billions of years because they, well, eh, . . . hmm.

Think about what Albert Mohler, as a phenomenon, means. He made it to the top of his organization—the Presidency—in spite of the fact that he believes ludicrous things.

Now think about Sarah Palin. If you think that Sarah Palin can’t take over the Republican Party, and win the presidential nomination, take note. Does anybody really believe that the Republican Party, as currently construed, is more rational than Louisville’s Southern Baptist Theological Seminary?

What makes you think that the Republican Party won’t do this (elect Sarah Palin as its Presidential nominee)? And what makes you think that Sarah Palin won’t then tap people with views like Albert Mohler’s as her science advisors?

As the economy fails to turn around, and the Republican Party becomes ever more beholden to its Albert Mohlers and Sarah Palins, a Sarah Palin presidency with young earth creationist science advisors is becoming ever more plausible, isn’t it?

RECENT POSTS:
--Donor 45: Talk about Speeding up Evolution!
--David Wolpe Succinctly Explains the New Atheist Moment
--Will Albert Mohler Be Tapped by Sarah Palin as One of Her Science Advisors?
--A Cyber-Pearl Harbor?
--In 1935, Were Cary Grant and Randolf Scott Sex Partners? No, But These Images Look Rather Camp

_______________________
Ms. Cairo writes several blogs including:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

And thanks to Google, I was able to find the source of the rock, vulture chain quote. It is also from a poem by Byron:

1 Titan! to whose immortal eyes

2 The sufferings of mortality,

3 Seen in their sad reality,

4 Were not as things that gods despise;

5 What was thy pity's recompense?

6 A silent suffering, and intense;

7 The rock, the vulture, and the chain,

8 All that the proud can feel of pain,

9 The agony they do not show,

10 The suffocating sense of woe,

11 Which speaks but in its loneliness,

12 And then is jealous lest the sky

13 Should have a listener, nor will sigh

14 Until its voice is echoless.



15 Titan! to thee the strife was given

16 Between the suffering and the will,

17 Which torture where they cannot kill;

18 And the inexorable Heaven,

19 And the deaf tyranny of Fate,

20 The ruling principle of Hate,

21 Which for its pleasure doth create

22 The things it may annihilate,

23 Refus'd thee even the boon to die:

24 The wretched gift Eternity

25 Was thine--and thou hast borne it well.

26 All that the Thunderer wrung from thee

27 Was but the menace which flung back

28 On him the torments of thy rack;

29 The fate thou didst so well foresee,

30 But would not to appease him tell;

31 And in thy Silence was his Sentence,

32 And in his Soul a vain repentance,

33 And evil dread so ill dissembled,

34 That in his hand the lightnings trembled.



35 Thy Godlike crime was to be kind,

36 To render with thy precepts less

37 The sum of human wretchedness,

38 And strengthen Man with his own mind;

39 But baffled as thou wert from high,

40 Still in thy patient energy,

41 In the endurance, and repulse

42 Of thine impenetrable Spirit,

43 Which Earth and Heaven could not convulse,

44 A mighty lesson we inherit:

45 Thou art a symbol and a sign

46 To Mortals of their fate and force;

47 Like thee, Man is in part divine,

48 A troubled stream from a pure source;

49 And Man in portions can foresee

50 His own funereal destiny;

51 His wretchedness, and his resistance,

52 And his sad unallied existence:

53 To which his Spirit may oppose

54 Itself--and equal to all woes,

55 And a firm will, and a deep sense,

56 Which even in torture can descry

57 Its own concenter'd recompense,

58 Triumphant where it dares defy,

59 And making Death a Victory.