Sunday, August 8, 2010

Theatre Aficianado At Large (arts & entertainment)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Theatre Aficinado At Large, by Kevin Daly

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.theatreaficionado.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Just a place where I can rant and rave and be a total lunatic about theatre, film and anything artistic that strikes me as entertaining, interesting or important.

MY REVIEW: Anyone who is a theatre lover will enjoy this blog. It's much more than reviews of plays or musical theatre (though we get those too), it's also a stroll down memory lane to great productions of the past, something ony someone who has been there could write.

Daly knows whereof he speaks, he writes well, informatively and entertainingly, and I highly recommend this blog.

(Sometimes he shares videos of great performances - actors reprising their roles at the Tony awards, for example - which Kindle viewers can't see.)

Sample post
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,” A Concept

“The play is presented as a rehearsal and takes place on a bare stage against a neutral backdrop, with perhaps one or two masking legs on either side.

During the play the facade of the White House as it changes through the years appears in the dark behind the drop as if suspended in mid-air.

Whenever possible, the actors enter from and exit to rehearsal benches on either side of the stage.

The time of the rehearsal is the present.

The time of the play is 1792-1902.”

This is an excerpt from the first page of a 1975 draft of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, in which librettist and lyricist Alan Jay Lerner establishes his well-intentioned conceit for the show. It all sounds well and good but we know how it all turned out – an unfortunate footnote in Broadway history. One hundred years of the White House and race relations, with a passing resemblance to Upstairs/Downstairs presented as a musical comedy with music by Leonard Bernstein. Why am I fascinated? Because there is so much that is good, but no basic structure or clear understanding of the underlying concept. Lerner wanted to use the conceit of the musical play being a show constantly in rehearsal, but there was so much history going on that the concept muddied the presidential pageantry with what seemed like two or three musicals happening at the same time. Lerner wanted the actors to step out and comment on the nation’s racial situation during and between scenes, but it was a promising idea left unfulfilled.

The draft contains many lines and situations which we will be a part of the final musical product (either in Philadelphia or New York). The through line for the family of servants is in place, as well as most of the presidents. Interestingly enough, there was a lot more material for the First Lady in the first version, but the “Duet for One” was not yet conceived. That moment was part of a transition song for the President to sing in the second act while talking to his servant Lud. His lyrics about the Hayes election were incorporated into the future, but glossed over much of the overall presidential history.

Already there is trouble. How do you decide which presidents are the most important, especially in terms of racial America? And of course, what about the other troubles of the first hundred years of the White House? Washington appears at the top, skips Adams (leaving that scene for Abigail) into Jefferson without much in the way of lucid transition. It’s confusing just to read one scene go into the next, because the stage ideas are half-baked, musical numbers left unfulfilled – though there are some which were performed without any changes from this draft. Going into the presidents, their relationship with the wives and then also the household servants, there is little room for the theatrical metaphors, which get lost along the way and brought up in arbitrary moments. It was in this part of the gestation that a call should have been made regarding whether or not the concept was even necessary. There are passing references to Mrs. Adams, who is easily the most fleshed out of the Presidents or First Ladies, becoming a ghost (!) but again, the ideas aren’t fleshed out and lack specificity. For what it’s worth though, the dialogue in this draft is better than most of the horrid lines heard in the final Broadway version. Ultimately it becomes a Presidential revue masquerading as a serious musical play.

But for me it comes back to that score, with its brilliant use of American musical idioms and Leonard Bernstein’s variations on patriotic numbers to create his score (including citations from “Hail to the Chief,” “Yankee Doodle” and “To Anacreon in Heaven,” which was adapted for our National Anthem. The overture, which played on Broadway, is – I think – worthy of the concert stage. The result is an eclectic musical style, with marches, waltzes, cakewalk, calypso and even a minstrel show reflecting on or commenting on the relations between Black and White America. (The minstrel show was met with a chilling reception resulting in booing and walkouts, which is also why I’m curious to see The Scottsboro Boys). The enterprise is done in by the lofty ambitions of Lerner’s script, which was eviscerated by the time the show opened at the Mark Hellinger Theatre.

I do wish that one of these days, someone might (to steal from Hugh Wheeler) find a coherent existence after so many years of muddle. The show failed, the score was swept under a rug without a cast album. But there are folks who wouldn’t let it be forgotten. Tapes of the show from its various incarnations exist in certain circles, and provide interesting insight into the show that just wasn’t there.

In 1997, A White House Cantata, a concert showcasing highlights from the score, was the final result of several attempts at revision. However, as I’ve stated before, I don’t feel that classical piece should be the final word. I do wonder if the Bernstein and Lerner estates would be interested in ever resuscitating the original piece for a complete studio album – with Broadway actors. In spite of the critical evisceration of ’76, what remains is the score and that is, in this case, the thing. A CD is available of A White House Cantata featuring Thomas Hampson and June Anderson. Conducted without feeling by Kent Nagano, the item is really for serious collectors only. It’s drained of anything close to color and life, mired in classical pretensions (particularly whenever Anderson tries to be funny).

In related news, some numbers from the score have been published for the very first time. “Take Care of This House” was, for many years, the only number available. The vocal selections which were printed by the Music of the Times Publishing Corp. were available for a short period of time and while incredibly rare, copies are available for perusal in the NYPL stacks. However, the mammoth soprano showcase, “Duet for One” was not included. It is now available for all those daring sopranos out there, published this summer as part of the new three book collection “Bernstein Theatre Songs” (in the high voice selections). If “Glitter and Be Gay” is florid coloratura, “Duet for One” calls for more incisive acting as the soprano involved must create two characters, alternating mezzo and soprano, oh and cap it off with a D above high C. It is one of the most satisfying numbers I have ever seen in performance.

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue will never be a great musical, and is likely to never be revived, etc., but it is a score of considerable merit and one which I think all serious musical theatre fans should know.

RECENT POSTS:
--“1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,” A Concept
--Tony’s Plate
--Jerry Orbach’s Broadway
--Bernadette Peters in “A Little Night Music”
--Reconsidering “Coco”

_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Broadway & Me (Arts & entertainment)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Broadway & Me, by Jan

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.broadwayandme.blogspot.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: I'm a theater lover. I am happiest when I am sitting in a theater. Or when I’m talking about theater. Or reading about theater. Or now blogging about it. If you’re checking this out, you're probably a theater lover too and I hope you’ll keep me company as I blog my way through this Broadway season.

MY REVIEW: The author posts at least twice a week - except this summer when she's averaging once a week.

I love this blog. I live several hours away from Broadway, and would love to be able to go see a Broadway show once a week...or even once a month... but the costs are just too prohibitive. Second best thing is to read this blog. If you've got the wherewithal to go see plays on Broadway, you'll want to read this blog.

Here's the author's bio: Jan, a lifelong theater lover, is the former Arts editor for TIME Magazine. She was also a contributing editor for the still-much-missed TheaterWeek magazine. She currently teaches arts reporting at the City University of New York’s Graduate School of Journalism and, of course, is married to the longtime pit musician K. The FTC also requires you to know that she is a member of the Advisory Committee of the American Theatre Wing, the Outer Critics Circle and the Independent Theater Bloggers Association. This means that, like professional critics, most of her theater tickets are comped but she promises that her comments in the reviews you read here are in no way compromised.


Highly recommended.

Sample post:
"Falling For Eve" Falls Short of Paradise

Fair warning: the remarks you’re about to read are going to sound sexist. So I apologize in advance. But last week I caught up with Falling for Eve, The York Theatre Company’s new musical retelling of the Adam and Eve story that is ending a three-week run at the Theatre at St. Peter’s on Aug. 8. A few minutes into the show, God (confusingly played in alternate scenes by male and female actors) creates Adam. And that's when Jose Llana appears, his back to the audience, but totally naked. “Yep,” I thought as he turned around and I ogled his perfect pecs, six-pack abs and come-hither thighs. “When God created man, this is definitely what he had in mind.”

And now that I’ve gone this far, let me be an equal opportunity offender: Krystal Joy Brown, who played Eve (she’s being replaced this week by Stephanie Umoh), is no slouch in the great body department either. On the way home, instead of humming the music, I tried to imagine what the casting sessions must have been like.

It’s not that the songs by Bret Simmons and David Howard are bad. I got a kick out of their list song "Good Things Are A-Comin,” which manages to squeeze the pop cultural history of the world from the Creation to the Obama Administration into three minutes. And some of their pop-flavored ballads are nice too. In fact, the entire show, as directed by Larry Raben, is sweet—in a freshman-class musical kind of way.

All six cast members (in addition to the original First Couple and the dual deities, two angels provide the comic relief) are enthusiastic, ethnically diverse in a way that you seldom see in a show that doesn’t center around race and several of them, particularly Brown, have great voices. Beowulf Boritt’s set is intentionally and amusingly tacky. And I’ve nothing but praise for Bobby Pearce’s costumes, even though that’s solely because he keeps Llana in a loincloth.

But Falling for Eve’s calling card is that its book is by Joe DiPietro who just won two fistfuls of Tonys for Memphis. This new book, based on a play written by the show’s lyricist, does come up with some original twists on how Paradise got lost. For instance—and there are spoilers at the end of this sentence—the snake is M.I.A. and Eve is a girl-power gal who can make her own decisions and pick her own fruit, while Adam is more of a slacker dude.

Still, the bottom line is that DiPietro once again has something to say about love, self-determination and the price one has to be willing to pay for them. But this time out he’s so eager to please that he ends up condescending to the audience with weak jokes that flaunt their anachronisms.


Falling for Eve is essentially a situation comedy and too little of the humor comes from the situation itself. The show dragged more often than it should have in 90 intermissionless minutes. Although I didn't so much mind since it gave me more time to gaze at Llana, whose heavenly physique is as close to paradise as this show gets.

RECENT POSTS:
--Still on Vacation Schedule... (Aug 7, 2010)
--"Falling For Eve" Falls Short of Paradise (Aug 4, 2010)
--So You Think You Can Dance Stumbles (July 31, 2010)
--Easing into a Vacation Schedule (July 28, 2010)
--The Irish..and How They Got That Way" is a Fitting Epitaph for the Late Frank McCourt (July 24, 2010)

_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Conservatives With Attitude (political opinion and news)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: Conservatives With Attitude, by Conservatives With Attitude

WEB ADDRESS: http://www.gopusanj.com/wordpress/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: Conservative commentary.

MY REVIEW: There are 6 regular bloggers here, although Michael Illions does seem to do the majority of the postings. Others are Sharon Soon, Mike Proto, Dr. Murray Sabrin, Richard Zuendt and Richard Ross. There is also the occasional guest blogger.

Rush Limbaugh talks often of Governor Christie of New Jersey, and how well he is doing in espousing conservative principles, so it was interesting to see someone at this blog only give him a C+.

The blog is indeed, strictly about New Jersey politics. Nevertheless, it's an interesting read even if you're not from New Jersey. Depressing, too. When you read about how politics really works in this country, you wonder how we ever got anything done.

Sample post:
(Just because it has some interesting numbers)
Even with the ’summer time blues’ affecting everyone’s numbers, Conservatives with Attitude! continues to be ranked as the Number One Political Website/Blog in the State of New Jersey, according to the respected blog and website monitoring organization, Alexa.com.

This month we added a couple of new organizations into the mix, like Garden State Equality, New Jersey Family Policy Council and the NJEA.

Please note that these Alexa.com traffic rankings are not just reflective of political blogs and/or websites*, but rather anything and everything on the Web that receives traffic and hits, and are the traffic rankings for the United States.

As of Sunday, August 1st, here are the United States traffic rankings for some of the more well known New Jersey political blogs, campaign websites, activist websites, and issue based organizational websites.

Conservatives with Attitude!………………………………..76,657
More Monmouth Musings………………………… …………119,506
Save Jersey……………………………….……… …………..119,528
NJEA……………………………………… ……………………151,403
Blue Jersey…………… ……………………………………….206,348
Anna Little for Congress………… ……………………………602,792
New Jersey State Democrat Party………………… ………No US Ranking
New Jersey State Republican Party… ……………….……No US Ranking
Scott Sipprelle for Congress………………… ……………..No US Ranking
Jon Runyan for Congress…………………… ………………No US Ranking
New Jersey Right to Life…………………………… ……….No US Ranking
New Jersey Tea Party Coalition…………… ……………….No US Ranking
New Jersey Family Policy Council……… …………………No US Ranking
Garden State Equality………………………………… …….No US Ranking

Are these numbers shocking or what? Do you know what a well coded graphical campaign website costs these days?

They would get more exposure by taking an ad on Conservatives with Attitude! instead of paying a consultant THOUSANDS of dollars for a website that obviously NO ONE is reading.

Jon, Scott, call me for my special campaign ad rates!

How about a look at some bonus numbers; World Rankings by Alexa.com, just to show you the disparity and the strength of Conservatives with Attitude!, against those issues based organizations, campaigns or activist websites that do not have a US ranking.

Conservatives with Attitude!……………………… ………..259,789
Scott Sipprelle for Congress…………………… …………..2,850,265
New Jersey State Republican Party………………….……2,852,482
Jon Runyan for Congress……………………………… ……3,174,982
New Jersey State Democrat Party……… …………………3,555,933
New Jersey Right to Life………………………… ………….3,803,823
New Jersey Family Policy Council…… ……………………4,500,065
New Jersey Tea Party Coalition………… ………………….4,548,897
Garden State Equality…………………………… ………….5,004,538

The purpose of this post, you ask? Well, obviously it is put ourselves over. There is NO promotion like self-promotion. These rankings truly speak for themselves.

The other reason, is more of a smackdown to those who predicted this blogs demise because I moved to the Conservative Party of New Jersey. Guess what, we’re Still Hereeeee, and causing more trouble then ever before!

Mel Brooks said it best in History of the World, Part I; “It’s good to be the King!”

*The above rankings do not include on-line newspaper websites or political news websites like the Star-Ledger, Asbury Park Press and PolitickerNJ.com

Truth be told, an Alexa ranking of 259,789 is nothing to write home about either...

RECENT POSTS:
--Interview with Pamela Yellen, author of Bank On Yourself
--No wonder we are in trouble in New Jersey
--The Face of Fascism
--Chris Christie’s first six months: C+
--August 01, 2010
_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

The Prudent Investor (business and investing)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: The Prudent Investor, by The Prudent Investor

WEB ADDRESS: http://prudentinvestor.blogspot.com

BLOG DESCRIPTION: The Prudent Investor evaluates global market trends and discusses the ongoing global redistribution of wealth.

MY REVIEW: Because of the name, I was expecting this to be a blog for the small investor, but it seems to be more about economics than anything else. So, a bit over my head, I admit. For those who have the financial wherewithal to be interested in how the big boys play, this blog will be of interest to you.

Sample post:
GATA - Volume of Fractional PM Trading At LBMA Now Withheld From Public Scrutiny
Monday, July 26, 2010

GATA's Adrian Douglas points to a new cover-up in the world of fractional reserve precious metals trading. Douglas notes that statistics of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) have recently moved behind the pay wall. Membership is granted only to producers and financial institutions.

Noting that the last available public statistics from June showed stratospheric volume developments Douglas suspects this is another move to keep precious metals markets as opaque as possible.

From Douglas' report:

The London Bullion Market Association has just taken the highly unusual step of blocking access to statistics relating to the trading activities of its member bullion banks. This information has been available to the public since 1997 but as of this week it is available only to LBMA members. (See http://www.lbma.org.uk)
I have recently written a series of exposes of the LBMA (see References 1 - 4 below) using the association's own data to show that the LBMA's bullion banks are operating on a "fractional reserve" basis. My analysis indicates that the bullion banks are holding only 1 real ounce for about every 45 ounces of gold that they have sold, a reserve ratio of just 2.3 percent.

At the March 25 public hearing of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission on precious metals futures markets I cited the LBMA's own statistics to label the "unallocated gold" accounts of the bullion banks as a Ponzi scheme. (See Reference 3 below.) There were bullion bank representatives at the hearing but no one expressed an objection. That hearing was videotaped and posted at the CFTC's Internet site but the bullion banks have not made any public statement rebutting what I said. In fact at that hearing Jeffrey Christian, CEO of the CPM Group, acknowledged that what is widely called the "physical market" is in reality a largely "paper market" trading gold and silver as if they are financial assets and not physical metals. Christian stated that 100 ounces of paper gold are traded for every 1 ounce of physical gold.

When the LBMA first made its trading statistics available in January 1997, observers and analysts were shocked. (See Reference 5 below.) No one could reconcile the statistics with other market data, nor comprehend how the bullion banks could be trading on a net basis more than 240,000 tonnes of gold annually while the global mine output was only 2,400 tonnes.

Over the years the furor over these statistics had subsided until the end of 2009, when I commenced writing about my studies, showing that the statistics can be reconciled with other market data if the bullion banks are operating a fractional-reserve bullion banking operation with a recklessly low reserve ratio. I have also shown how the price of gold is suppressed because 45 ounces of demand are being diluted to result in purchase of only 1 ounce of real metal. If instead all 45 ounces were to be sourced and purchased, the gold price would be multiples of the current price.

Typically when people are exposed in a scandal their first reaction is a cover-up. The most notorious examples of this are the Nixon administration, when it doctored the Watergate tapes, and Arthur Anderson, which shredded millions of pages of documents relating to audits of Enron Corp.

The LBMA has now commenced a cover-up with respect to the gold trading activities of its member bullion banks, withdrawing statistics from the public domain.

This appears not to be the only cover-up going on in the gold market.

For years the International Monetary Fund has made great fanfare of its mere contemplation of selling some of its gold, and actual sales by the IMF have been widely publicized. Since February the IMF has been surreptitiously selling large tonnages of gold each month, but these sales now are to be found only by digging through the IMF's financial statements, and even there the recipients of the gold are not disclosed. (See Reference 6 below.) One has to wonder why the IMF now is trying to fly under the radar with its gold sales.

Similarly it was recently discovered that the Bank for International Settlements didn't feel it necessary to announce its involvement in the largest gold swap in history, 346 tonnes. (See Reference 7 below.) The BIS swaps instead were discovered only because a market analyst dug through the footnotes of the bank's financial statements.

These developments have all the hallmarks of cover-ups.

In June the LBMA trading statistics showed that in May 2010 the average net daily trading in gold by LBMA member banks jumped a massive 50 percent from the month before to 24 million ounces each day from 16 million ounces each day. That translates to $7.5 trillion annually. If an operation is running on a razor-thin fractional reserve basis, such step changes are often fatal.
It appears that a run on the bullion banks has commenced.

Concealing Trade Information
There is a cover-up of back-door injections of liquidity of physical gold, and the LBMA now is trying to conceal trading information.

There has been much debate about how investors, politicians, and regulators didn't see the 2008 financial crisis coming, and lack of transparency was cited as a key reason. Clearly those who have been manipulating the gold market are trying to skulk deeper into darkness. They have a lot to hide.

Investors could have been blindsided by the events of 2008, but anyone who misses the writing on the wall about what's going on in the bullion markets is just foolish. The bullion banks have sold far more metal than they can deliver, and more and more customers are asking them to deliver. This has led to back-door bailouts and cover-ups.

Anyone who has "unallocated" bullion should be very concerned. The LBMA itself describes owners of "unallocated bullion" accounts as "unsecured creditors." That means that the account holder has no collateral or title to any bullion.

Bullion bank unallocated account agreements require the bank only to settle in cash for non-performance. That means when the physical squeeze that is evolving takes gold and silver prices to multiples of the current price, holders of unallocated metal accounts will not get any bullion, nor will they be compensated at the prevailing market price.

I interpret the LBMA's move to secrecy as a sign that the opportunity to get real metal is closing fast.

References:
1. Adrian Douglas: Proof of Gold Price suppression -- Gold and the U.S. Dollar
2. Adrian Douglas: Price Suppression Follows Inevitably from Fractional-Reserve Gold Banking
3. Adrian Douglas: It's Admitted to the CFTC: London Gold Market Is a Ponzi Scheme
4. Adrian Douglas: Jeff Christian's CPM Group Explains How to Make Paper Gold
5. The Grand LBMA Expose: A Collective-Mind Analysis
6. Adrian Douglas: IMF Can't Explain Gold Sales Now Without Revealing Squeeze
7. Adrian Douglas: Mysterious BIS Gold Swaps Are Likely a Bullion Bank Bailout

RECENT POSTS:
--When Money Dies" by A. Ferguson Can Be Read Onlin...
--Read Sought-After "The Dying Of Money" on Hyper In...
--GATA - Volume of Fractional PM Trading At LBMA Now...
--BP Spill Reminder #20 - Day 98 - £15 Million For L...
--BP Spill Reminder #19 - Day 95 - Is the Gulf Strea...
--BP Spill Reminder #18 - Day 94 - Simmons: The Bigg...
_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space Sciences
Topical Murder and Dated Death

The Friendly Atheist (lifestyle and culture)


REVIEWED BY: Marguerite Zelle

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

AMAZON SUBSCRIPTION LINK: The Friendly Atheist, by Hemant Mehta

WEB ADDRESS: http://friendlyatheist.com/

BLOG DESCRIPTION: This is the blog of "eBay Atheist" Hemant Mehta. Mehta writes about atheism for both religious and non-religious readers. He is also the author of "I Sold My Soul on eBay."

MY REVIEW: As an atheist, I enjoyed this blog for the most part. Well written, interesting stories. However, as a woman I'm always amused because the religion that American atheists go after 99% of the time is Christianity, whereas it's the spectre of Islam gaining hold in the US that has me terrified. (Well, I'm not terrified, because I don't think it can happen, but I think Islam is much more of a danger to the world than Christianity. However, it is a helluva lot easier for atheists to debate/mock Christianity than it is to do the same to Islam, cuz it's the Muslims who will take out their machetes and kill you.)

Well, don't get me started on that rant.

Anyway, this blog is of interest to atheists. It should also be of interest to Christians, to see what atheists think, and why they think what they do.


Sample post:
Are Home-Schooled Children Really Smarter?
Posted in Education, General at 6:00 am by Hemant Mehta

The Creation Museum founder Ken Ham has a nasty habit of not linking to websites he trashes or offering citations when he makes his wacky claims.

So when he mentioned that home-schoolers excel in college, and provided a link to the reference, I got very excited.

The link goes to the Home School Legal Defense Association — a Christian group — and they have issued a press release about a new study!

Therefore, it was with great interest that we read the new study — Exploring Academic Outcomes of Homeschooled Students, by Michael F. Cogan — which shows homeschoolers succeeding in college.



Some of the major findings include:

Homeschoolers scored higher on the ACT (26.5) compared with the overall student body (25).
Homeschoolers earned more college credit (14.7) prior to their freshman year compared to the student body (6).
Homeschooled students earned a higher fall semester GPA (3.37) when compared to other freshman students (3.08).
Homeschooled students earned a higher first-year GPA (3.41) when compared to other freshman students (3.12).
Homeschooled students earned a higher fourth-year GPA (3.46) when compared to other freshman students who completed their fourth year (3.16).
Sounds pretty strong. I have so many questions!

How many home-schooled students were used as data points?

How many states were represented in the study?

Where was this study published?

Here’s all I can find to answer those:

The study was based on a medium sized college located in the upper Midwest. The school has 11,000 students with an average 1,320 freshmen each year. The sample size for homeschoolers was 76 which is 1 percent of the 7,776 incoming freshman for 2004–2009. The majority of the student body (54.9%) identified themselves as Catholic.

In other words… Cogan went to one college — a private, Roman Catholic school in the midwest — and got the data for the 76 kids who, over the past six years, were home-schooled beforehand.

If I proposed this study in a Research Methods class, I would fail immediately.

This is likely an anomaly — who knows how many home-schooled children applied but didn’t get accepted into the school? What makes this school typical for all home-schooled college students? If anything, a private school of that size is going to draw in more affluent, better-educated kids overall.

And from the looks of it, this “study” wasn’t published anywhere.

At least we can read it for ourselves, right?

Of course not.

All you get is a link to Powerpoint slides (PDF) Cogan must have made to explain the findings.

I’m sure I’m missing something here. Am I being fair about this study? Am I forgetting to point something out? Is there a link to the study I’m missing?

For what it’s worth, I think home-schooling can work… but in too many cases, it deprives children of a fuller education and the opportunity to socialize with peers who may think differently. There’s often a hyper-focus on religion and a lack of focus on subjects the parents know little about. Even among atheist households, I get nervous when I hear that parents are home-schooling their children.

Some parents do it wonderfully, but in my experience, they are the exception and not the rule.

RECENT POSTS:
--Have You Signed Up for Skepticon?
--Are Home-Schooled Children Really Smarter?
--The Caption Made Me Laugh
--What Can Atheists Learn from the LGBT Movement?
--Tuesdays with Hitchens
_______________________
Check out the following blogs:
Seaborn: Oceanography Blog
Star Trek Report: Space SciencesTopical Murder and Dated Death